JUDGING THE ENTRIES, SELECTING WINNERS
John’s picks:
Clear winner: [R5] - Threshold ([email protected], [email protected]) - $1,000
Runner up: [AN3] - Threshold Name (Albert, [email protected])
“Name: Hadron
Rationale: In particle physics, a hadron is a composite subatomic particle made of two or more quarks held together by the strong force. Similarly, threshold cbd service is a composite, consisting of a splitting a joint secret(the decryption ey) into multiple shares(quarks) that are held together by encryption(the strong force). Additionally, the word hadron isn't being used by many projects or domains. Finally, it sounds cool and is easy to say, as well as being easy to spell for non-native english speakers.”
Disqualified: did not submit
nicos picks:
Notification Bot A Winner AN2: I confirm Johns sentiments on this team. B. I agree this submission think the effort and participation of the group are a drawback. At the very least they could have reached out to us, but to use the submission form as a method of gleaning our log ins is at best counter-decentralization and counter- crustless. At worst the may actually use this entry for malicious purpose. C. I had a chance to visit this group and agree with John, they are a professional group, I didn’t even realize they had ha head start on writing the project- which immediately disqualifies them. I originally scored them high for their creativity and professionalism in presenting - but this is a hackathon and not a symposium so I put them in last place.
Naming CBD: R5 Threshold was by far my favorite entry in this category, and the best overall entry of any category. This father Daughter team drove to ETH Denver from Canada. The Daughter is very involved in Web3, aware of early and prominent NFT projects, and has a dedicate approach to understanding Web3 content. They had a focused presentation and hit all the marks I seek in justifying research methodology. They took time to review our marketing materials, making sure they understood the product and project, and even identified the differences between tBTC V1 and V2. They were onsite well beyond the ETH Denver presentation timeframe which added a lot of participation “posts” to my score. B. I think the first team demonstrated how much can be accomplished, it really put the other entry in a far second place.
Content: Winner R5 Threshold $1000 Runner Up Dr Adaku $500 to $750 - I think there is benefit in awarding Dr Adaku because she has expressed interest in contributing to the DAO. She also may act as a gateway to additional international communities. Additionally she has a strong understanding and following of Lens and Shaver. These are up and coming social networks and I believe an alternate to Twitter. I have a hard time following the protocol and I think it is a good idea to encourage a liaison to join our DAO. Dr Adaku may in fact be this liaison.
FINAL BOUNTIES SUBMITTED
Bounty #1: CONTENT